Your AI agents are everywhere.
Your AI value is nowhere.

A spreadsheet does the same arithmetic without the version history, and rarely survives the person who built it. FinOps tools show what you spent on AI, not what it returned. A dashboard shows a metric moving, but takes no position on what caused it or what it was worth. Roiva joins AI cost to the outcomes in your CRM, help desk, and ledger, with every dollar traced to its formula, its source record, or the person who entered it, and an audit trail.

Almost nobody has them, which is why capturing one is often part of the first month rather than a prerequisite. Roiva records how each baseline was arrived at, so an estimate stays visibly an estimate instead of disappearing into a total. And the cheapest time to capture "before" is before your next rollout, not after it.

If the initiative has been running in a system you connect to Roiva, your first number comes from its history, not from waiting. Connect the system, agree the formula and what "before" looked like, and Roiva works out each full month since go-live as the data syncs, ready for finance to approve. If you'd rather we do the setup, the 30-Day ROI Readout presents a board-ready number on day thirty. A rollout that's only just started needs a few weeks of readings after go-live before there's an "after" to compare.

All three, with different jobs. The AI leader owns the portfolio: which initiatives run, the budget each was approved for, and the call to scale, fix, or cut. Finance owns the methodology and signs off the reported number. The teams running the initiatives, in support, sales, finance, engineering and elsewhere, feed it. What makes it work is one named owner on your side, at roughly two hours a week in the first month.

No. A governance inventory records what each AI system is and the risk it carries. Roiva records what each initiative costs, what it returns, and the call made on it. The two sit side by side: the inventory for risk review, Roiva for budget and portfolio review. To start, upload an export of the register you keep, and Roiva proposes initiatives from it for you to review.

Every value entry says where it came from. A calculated entry keeps its versioned formula and a snapshot of its inputs, so last quarter's number can be re-run on last quarter's assumptions. A synced entry keeps the source records it was counted from, and an entry a person entered names the person and the documents they cite. An approval step keeps unapproved value out of reported ROI, and ROI is taken over cash alone: hours your team got back are reported beside it as freed capacity, and count as cash only when a document shows they became cash. Attribution is an explicit rule your team chooses and documents -- not a causal experiment, and we don't claim otherwise. Read the measurement methodology →

Start free: the free account never expires, lists any number of ideas, and measures a set number of initiatives at a time. When you measure more, one subscription priced by the AI spend you track in Roiva, not by headcount, seats or usage. To have us set up the first number, a 30-Day ROI Readout takes one initiative to a board-ready readout, its fee credited in full against year one. The prices and the free account's limits are on https://roiva.ai/pricing, the one page that states them. See pricing and the 30-Day ROI Readout →

Your data is never used to train models, and the Roiva Assistant, built on Anthropic's Claude, receives only the context a response needs. Our SOC 2 Type 2 program with Oneleet started on September 25, 2026, and its observation period started on October 21, 2026. An independent CPA firm will issue the report after that period ends. Request our policies, and the report once it's issued, through the Roiva Trust Center. Until then, we'll send Oneleet's engagement letter and our sub-processor list, sign our DPA, and answer your security questionnaire within one business day. Read the security overview →